ARCHWAY
[COMPARISON]

Archway vs Miro

Miro is a whiteboard — infinite canvas, sticky notes, shapes, video calls built in. It's made for brainstorming, retrospectives, and workshops, not system architecture. Archway is the opposite: a focused tool for describing and maintaining software architecture diagrams.

FEATURE_BY_FEATURE

FeatureArchwayMiro
Primary use caseSoftware architecture diagramsWhiteboarding, brainstorming, retros
PriceFree; Pro $12/mo; Team $35/user/moFree (3 boards); Starter $8/user/mo; Business $16/user/mo
AI generation from textYes — coreLimited (Miro AI: sticky clustering, mind-map expansion)
Cloud architecture icons1,900+ with brand colorsGeneric shape libraries, some AWS
Generate from GitHub / Terraform / K8sYesNo
Infinite canvasAuto-layout focusInfinite canvas
Sticky notes, voting, mind mapsNoYes — core features
Video calls on canvasNoYes
Export formatsPNG, SVG, Mermaid, PlantUML, D2, draw.io, Terraform, JSONPNG, PDF, CSV
Real-time collaborationYesYes — flagship feature
Best forEngineers maintaining architecture docsMixed teams running workshops / retros
[PICK_ARCHWAY_IF]

Use Archway when

  • The artifact you want is a proper architecture diagram
  • You're an engineering team, not a cross-functional workshop
  • You need real cloud icons and export to engineering formats
  • You'd rather describe the system than drag shapes around
[PICK_MIRO_IF]

Use Miro when

  • You're running a retrospective, brainstorm, or mixed workshop
  • You need sticky notes, voting, timers, and breakout rooms
  • Your "diagram" is really a collaborative canvas
[VERDICT]

They solve different problems. Use Miro for collaborative whiteboarding. Use Archway when the output needs to be an actual, exportable architecture diagram.