ARCHWAY
[COMPARISON]

Archway vs draw.io

draw.io (now diagrams.net) is the most popular free diagramming tool — you draw everything by hand, and it's genuinely great at that. Archway takes a different bet: tell an AI what you want, get a rendered diagram, then refine. You still get draw.io export if you want a drag-and-drop session afterward.

FEATURE_BY_FEATURE

FeatureArchwaydraw.io
PriceFree forever tier; Pro $12/moFree (MIT license)
AI generation from textYes — core featureNo
Generate from Terraform / K8s / ComposeYesNo
Generate from GitHub repoYes — auto-updates on pushNo
Cloud architecture icons1,900+ nativeCloud shape libraries (AWS/Azure/GCP); manual placement
Export to draw.io formatYes — full round-trip(Native)
Self-hostedEnterprise tierYes (open source)
Real-time collaborationYesLimited (via Google Drive / Confluence)
Offline desktop appNoYes (Electron build)
Best forTeams generating + maintaining architecture docsHand-crafted diagrams, free tier
[PICK_ARCHWAY_IF]

Use Archway when

  • You want to describe architecture in English, not click-click-click
  • You need diagrams to stay in sync with code (auto-update from repo)
  • You care about time-to-first-diagram (<60 seconds)
[PICK_DRAW.IO_IF]

Use draw.io when

  • You want completely free, self-hostable, forever
  • You prefer manual drag-and-drop and already know what you want
  • You need offline desktop support
[VERDICT]

Export your Archway output to draw.io format any time. They're not mutually exclusive — use Archway to generate, draw.io to hand-tune if you want.